You are viewing [info]rcfox's journal

my days at the office
My warped views on poker, politics, and life
Will APS Act? 
7th-Dec-2009 08:16 pm
2007 picture
For the people who still believe agw is happening, a group of physicists--yes, a small group, but one containing well respected scientists--have asked the American Physical Society to rescind its statement on Global Warming. Why? Well, via Volokh through Bishop Hill:

Dear fellow member of the American Physical Society:

This is a matter of great importance to the integrity of the Society. It is being sent to a random fraction of the membership, so we hope you will pass it on.

By now everyone has heard of what has come to be known as ClimateGate, which was and is an international scientific fraud, the worst any of us have seen in our cumulative 223 years of APS membership. For those who have missed the news we recommend the excellent summary article by Richard Lindzen in the November 30 edition of the Wall Street journal, entitled “The Climate Science isn’t Settled,” for a balanced account of the situation. It was written by a scientist of unquestioned authority and integrity. A copy can be found among the items at http://tinyurl.com/lg266u, and a visit to http://www.ClimateDepot.com can fill in the details of the scandal, while adding spice.

What has this to do with APS? In 2007 the APS Council adopted a Statement on global warming (also reproduced at the tinyurl site mentioned above) that was based largely on the scientific work that is now revealed to have been corrupted. (The principals in this escapade have not denied what they did, but have sought to dismiss it by saying that it is normal practice among scientists. You know and we know that that is simply untrue. Physicists are not expected to cheat.)

We have asked the APS management to put the 2007 Statement on ice until the extent to which it is tainted can be determined, but that has not been done. We have also asked that the membership be consulted on this point, but that too has not been done.

None of us would use corrupted science in our own work, nor would we sign off on a thesis by a student who did so. This is not only a matter of science, it is a matter of integrity, and the integrity of the APS is now at stake. That is why we are taking the unusual step of communicating directly with at least a fraction of the membership.

If you believe that the APS should withdraw a Policy Statement that is based on admittedly corrupted science, and should then undertake to clarify the real state of the art in the best tradition of a learned society, please send a note to the incoming President of the APS ccallan@princeton.edu, with the single word YES in the subject line. That will make it easier for him to count.

Bob Austin, Professor of Physics, Princeton
Hal Lewis, emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Will Happer, Professor of Physics, Princeton
Larry Gould, Professor of Physics, Hartford
Roger Cohen, former Manager, Strategic Planning, ExxonMobil

I remain amused.
Comments 
8th-Dec-2009 05:50 am (UTC)
Let me know when the physicists publish papers instead of letters.
8th-Dec-2009 02:25 pm (UTC) - Actual physicists ...
are dubious about this letter. It wasn't sent on behalf of the APS, just to APS members. Despite what it says, Lindzen is a climate change cynic.
8th-Dec-2009 07:49 am (UTC)
Wow.

A manager of strategic planning at ExxonMobil is somewhat skeptical of global warming. Stirring stuff.

Please, if the CEO of Coca-Cola expresses his doubt that Pepsi really is the taste of a new generation, let us all know.
8th-Dec-2009 03:28 pm (UTC)
Heh, doesn't it say FORMER manager?

Then again, it would be pretty cool if he ripped off his jacket at a global warming conference to reveal an ExxonMobil T-shirt underneath and that his apparent resignation from his former position was nothing more than a ploy.

All this while pro wrestling music suddenly starts playing in the background.
10th-Dec-2009 05:19 pm (UTC) - And then there is this ...
Dear APS Member:

Recently, you may have received an unsolicited email from Hal Lewis, Bob Austin, Will Happer, Larry Gould and Roger Cohen regarding the APS and climate change. Please be assured that this was not an official APS message, nor was it sent with APS knowledge or approval. A number of members have complained to APS regarding this unsolicited e-mail. If the e-mail addresses used to send this message were obtained from our membership directory, this was contrary to the stated guidelines for members' use of the directory. We arecontinuing to investigate how the senders obtained APS member email addresses.
...

From the President of the APS. via Dave Bacon
This page was loaded May 27th 2012, 12:59 pm GMT.